Press "Enter" to skip to content

AI effect on arXiv math.PR ?

GPT-4March 2023
GPT-4oMay 2024
o1 (full version) first reasoning modelDecember 2024
GPT-4.5February 2025
GPT-5August 2025
GPT-5.1November 2025
GPT-5.2December 2025
GPT-5.3-CodexFebruary 2026
GPT-5.4March 2026
Claude Sonnet 4.6February 2026
GPT-5.5April 2026
Claude Fable 5June 2026
GPT-5.6July 2026
Claude Opus 5July 2026
GPT-6 AstraSeptember 2026
Time series analysis
Time series analysis (with AI)

This post is about a natural question: we all feel a rise in the number of submissions on arXiv. But what is the quantitative reality, and what are the plausible conclusions? To explore this question, I have prompted ChatGPT to produce a gentle Python script to extract the monthly submissions to arXiv.math.PR, over the last ten years, using the arXiv API. This is more subtle than one can imagine. I have then prompted ChatGPT to produce the graphics and a time series analysis, keeping in mind a possible Covid effect and AI effect. What do we see? A global increase, with a long pause plausibly due to Covid, and a recent (2026) rise plausibly due to AI.

We bring together a descriptive analysis of monthly counts of articles classified under probability on arXiv, exploratory detection of trend changes, sensitivity checks, an examination of additional breaks over 2023–2026, and a discussion of possible explanations, including the Covid-19 pandemic and the rise of artificial intelligence. The analysis covers 120 consecutive months and 41 013 articles, including both primary and secondary classifications; the complete monthly counts are reproduced in Appendix A. The main model, a continuous piecewise-linear trend with monthly seasonal effects, selects breakpoints in October 2020, March 2023 and February 2026. These dates are not invariant across models: the most stable signal is a sharp acceleration in late 2025–early 2026, preceded by a slowdown and then a recovery whose dates are harder to pinpoint. Within the 2023–2026 window, an additional inflection in mid-2023 remains possible, whereas the segmentations of 2024–2025 are less stable. The aggregate series cannot attribute these developments to a particular cause or establish the persistence of the latest regime.

Further reading.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Syntax · Style · .