Processing math: 100%
Press "Enter" to skip to content

Little ell p

Stefan Banach
Stefan Banach (1892 - 1945)

I teach topology and differential calculus this semester. This is the occasion to play with many nice mathematical concepts, including one of my favorite Banach spaces : p spaces. These spaces are at the same time simple, important, and subtle. This tiny post collects some basic properties of these spaces, just for pleasure. I will improve this tiny post from time to time.

In what follows, K{R,C}.

p spaces. For all p[1,), p=p(N,K) is the set of sequences (xn)nN in K such that xp:=n|xn|p<. We also define =(N,K) the set of sequences (xn)nN in K such that x:=supn|xn|<. These spaces naturally generalize Rn to R. Note by the way that [0,1]p, p[1,], but the topology induced by p on [0,1] is not the product topology, it is stronger, in particular for p= it corresponds to uniform convergence rather than convergence of each coordinate.

We always have p1p2 for all 1p1<p2.

Three spaces are of special importance: 1, 2, and .

Functional point of view. A sequence (xn)nN in K is a function NK, x(n):=xn. If we equip N with the discrete topology, the discrete σ-field, and the counting measure dn, then p(N,K)=Lp(N,dn,K)andxpp=|x(n)|pdn, while =L(N,dn,K)=Cb(N,K). But let us study these spaces from scratch.

For all nN, we set en:=1n, in such a way that for all xp, x=nxnen.

Completeness. The spaces p, p[1,], are Banach spaces : complete normed vector spaces. The vector space nature and the norm axioms are not difficult to check. To establish the completeness of p when p[1,), we consider a Cauchy sequence (x(m)) in p. For all n, (x(m)n) is a Cauchy sequence in Rn which is complete, hence we get a sequence x=(xn) such that x(m)nxn as m, for all n. Next, since (x(m)) is bounded in p, for all N, Nn=0|xn|p=limmNn=0|x(m)k|psupmx(m)pp< thus xp by taking the limit N. Next, Nn=0|x(m)nxn|p=limkKn=0|x(m)nx(k)n|p¯limkx(m)x(k)pp, which implies that x(m)x in p since (x(m)) is Cauchy in p. This also works for .

For p=2, we get a Hilbert space 2 with dot product xy:=nxn¯yn, while when p2, the norm p does not satisfy the parallelogram identity and is thus not Hilbertian.

Not locally compact. The argument can be adapted to any infinite dimensional normed vector space. Namely, for p, p[1,], for any r>0, xn:=ren=r1n satisfies xnp=r and xnxm=r21/p if nm, also for any ε>0, if ¯B(0,r) was coverable by a finite number of balls of radius ε>0, then one of these ball would contain at least two distinct points xn and xm, and this would give r21/p=xnxm2ε, which is impossible when ε<r21/p1.

Non separability of . For IN, set eI:=iIei. Then for IJ, we have eIeJ=1, thus B(eI,12)B(eJ,12)=, thus can be covered by an uncountable family of disjoint non-empty balls, since the set of non-empty subsets of N is uncountable. This argument does not work for p with p[1,), since in this case eIp imposes that I is finite, and the set of non-empty finite subsets of N is countable.

Separability of p, p[1,). If suffices to consider A:=nAn where An:={ni=0qiei:qQn+1K}. Hence for all xp and all ε>0, denoting πn(x):=n1i=0xiei, we have xπn(x)pε for a large enough n, and then πn(x)ynpε for some yAn thanks to the density of QK in K. Note that the approximation xπn(x)pε of x by the finitely supported sequence πn(x) does not work in . Actually the closure in of the set of finitely supported sequences is the set of sequences which tend to 0 at , denoted 0, which is strictly smaller than , and which is a separable Banach subspace of .

Hölder inequality. For all p[1,], q:=p/(p1)[1,], all xp, yq, n|xnyn|xpyq. It follows from the Hölder inequality on Rn for πn(x)=n1i=0xiei and πn(y)=n1i=0yiei. The equality is achieved when |xn|p and |yn|q are proportional (possibly asymptotically).

Dual of p, p[0,). Recall that the dual of a normed vector space X is the normed vector space X=L(X,K) of continuous linear forms, namely continuous linear mappings XK.

For all p[1,), denoting q:=1/(11/p)=p/(p1)(1,] the Hölder conjugate of p, the map Φ:q(p) defined for all yq and xp by Φ(y)(x):=nxnyn is a bijective linear isometry. In particular (p)q. In particular (2)2, (1), and ((p))p (reflexivity) for p(1,).

Proof. The map Φ is well defined thanks to the Hölder inequality, and Φ(x)(p)xq. Let us establish the equality, hence it is injective or into, and then that it is surjective or onto.

Let us consider the case p=1 (q=). Let y. There exists (nk) such that |ynk|y when k. For all k, xk:=|ynk|ynkenk1 satifies xk1=1 and Φ(y)(xk)=|ynk|y when k, hence Φ=y, and Φ is an isometry and thus an injection. For the surjectivity, if hφ(1) then for all x1, φ(x)=nynxn with yn:=φ(en), but |yn|φen1=φ< hence y and φ=Φ(y).

Let us consider the case p>1 (q<). The equality case in the Hölder inequality xn:=yn|yn||yn|q1 satisfies xpp=yqq since p(q1)=q, hence Φ(y)(x)=yqq=yqxp, hence Φ(y)(p)=yq, and Φ is an isometry hence it is injective. Let us show that Φ is surjective. Let φ(p), then for all xp, φ(x)=nxnyn where yn:=φ(en) with en:=1n. Suppose by contradiction that yq. Denoting πN(z):=(z0,z1,,zN1,0,0,), and xn:=|yn|yn|yn|q1, since yq,
Φ(y)(πN(x))πN(x)p=πN(y)qn,which contradicts Φ(y)(p).

Dual of . The dual of =(1) is strictly larger than 1. More precisely, the map Φ:1() defined by Φ(y)(x):=nxnyn is a linear isometry which is injective but not surjective. In other words, 1()=((1)), in other words 1 is not reflexive.

Proof. The isometry (and thus the injectivity) comes from the Hölder inequality
|Φ(y)(x)|xy1 and its equality case xn=|yn|yn, which gives  Φ(y)=y1. It remains to establish that Φ is not surjective. Consider the following subspace of :
S:={(xn):x:=limnxn exists}.
The linear functional xx is bounded has unit norm on S. Thanks to the Hahn--Banach (for the non separable Banach space ) we can extend it into L:K in such a way that |Lx|x=supn|xn| and Lx=limnxn of (xn) converges. We have thus constructed a "limit" to each bounded sequence, which respects linearity, and which coincides with the usual limit for converging sequences. In particular this proves that ()1. Indeed, if we had L(x)=nxnyn for some (yn)1, then, if we define, for a fixed m and 0, xn:=0 if n<m and xn:= if nm, then we would get a contradiction : =L(x)=nmynm0.

The space S above can be seen as the space of continuous functions on the Alexandrov compactification ¯N=N{} of N. The topology on this space is metrizable, and by a Riesz theorem, every linear form on S can be seen as a measure on ¯N. The linear form L above corresponds then clearly to the Dirac mass at . This functional respects the additive structure but not necessarily the multiplicative one, in other words we do not have necessarily L(xy)=L(x)L(y), and similarly we do not have necessarily L(f(x))=f(L(x)) for all f.

Representation.

  • Every separable Banach space is isomorphic to a quotient 1/S where S is a closed subspace of 1.
  • Every separable Hilbert space of infinite dimension is isomorphic to 2 (via a Hilbert basis).
Stefan Banach
Stefan Banach (1892 - 1945)
    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Syntax · Style · .