
This post is devoted to a quick proof of a version of the law of large numbers for non-negative random variables in L2. It does not require independence or same distribution. It is a variant of the famous one for independent random variables bounded in L4.
The statement. If X1,X2,… are non-negative L2 random variables on (Ω,A,P) such that limn→∞1nE(Sn)=ℓ∈R, and Var(Sn)=O(n) where Sn:=X1+⋯+Xn, then limn→∞Snn=ℓ almost surely.
A proof. We have E(∑n(Sn2−E(Sn2)n2)2)=∑nVar(Sn2)n4=O(∑n1n2)<∞. It follows that ∑n(Sn2−E(Sn2)n2)2<∞ almost surely, which implies that Sn2−E(Sn2)n2→0 almost surely. This gives that 1n2Sn2→ℓ almost surely. It remains to use the sandwichSn2n2n2(n+1)2≤Skk≤S(n+1)2(n+1)2(n+1)2n2 valid if k is such that n2≤k≤(n+1)2 (here we use the non-negative nature of the X's).
Note and further reading. I have learnt this proof recently from my friend Arnaud Guyader who found it in a paper (Theorem 5) by Bernard Delyon and François Portier. It is probably a classic however. It is possible to drop the assumption of being non-negative by using X=X+−X−, but this would require to modify the remaining assumptions, increasing the complexity, see for instance Theorem 6.2 in Chapter 3 of Erhan Çinlar book (and the blog post comments below). The proof above has the advantage of being quick and beautiful.
9 Comments