Processing math: 100%
Press "Enter" to skip to content

Month: September 2011

Two open problems about concentation

Talagrand has shown that there exists universal constants c,C>0 such that for any independent and identically distributed random variables X1,,Xn in the unit disk D of C, any convex and Lipschitz function f:DnR, and any real number r>0,

P(|f(X1,,Xn)Ef(X1,,Xn)|r)Cexp(cr2).

An accessible proof can be found in Ledoux's monograph on the concentration phenomenon (chapter 4). This inequality is useful for instance in order to control the distance of a random vector to a sub-vector space of controlled dimension. In many situations, one would like a similar concentration result, beyond these restrictive assumptions. Let us consider for instance a n×n random matrix M with i.i.d. entries (standard Gaussian or symmetric Bernoulli ±1). Here are two open questions about concentration of measure for which the Talagrand inequality is not enough as is due to the lack of one of the assumptions:

  • concentration for the function log|det(M)|=logdetMM=ni=1log(si(M))
  • concentration for the least singular value sn(M)=minx=1Mx2
Leave a Comment
Syntax · Style · .