{"id":21367,"date":"2025-02-07T15:36:50","date_gmt":"2025-02-07T14:36:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/?p=21367"},"modified":"2025-03-13T22:01:31","modified_gmt":"2025-03-13T21:01:31","slug":"spectral-gap-concentration-in-high-dimension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2025\/02\/07\/spectral-gap-concentration-in-high-dimension\/","title":{"rendered":"Spectral gap concentration in high dimension"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/mind-the-gap-300x241.jpg\" alt=\"London tube logo &quot;Mind the gap!&quot;\" width=\"300\" height=\"241\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3188\" srcset=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/mind-the-gap-300x241.jpg 300w, https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/10\/mind-the-gap.jpg 442w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">This short post is devoted to a very natural and simple random diffusion operator on the Euclidean space for which the spectral gap exhibits high-dimensional concentration.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Diffusion operator.<\/strong> Let $\\Sigma$ be a $d\\times d$ positive definite real symmetric matrix, and ${(X_t)}_{t\\geq0}$ be the simplest Markov diffusion on $\\mathbb{R}^d$ for which the Gaussian $\\mu=\\mathcal{N}(0,\\Sigma)$ is invariant. It is the overdamped Langevin or Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process solving the stochastic differential equation \\[   X_t   =\\sqrt{2}B_t-\\int_0^t\\nabla V(X_s)\\mathrm{d}s   =\\sqrt{2}B_t-\\int_0^t\\Sigma^{-1}X_s\\mathrm{d}s \\] where $B$ is a standard Brownian motion on $\\mathbb{R}^d$, and $V(x)=\\frac{1}{2}\\langle\\Sigma^{-1}x,x\\rangle$. The process is ergodic : $X_t\\to\\mu$ in law as $t\\to\\infty$ regardless of $X_0$, and more generally exponentially ergodic : for all $X_0$ and $t\\geq0$, denoting $f_t$ the density of $\\mathrm{Law}(X_t)$ with respect to $\\mu$, we have \\[   \\int(f_t-1)^2\\mathrm{d}\\mu   \\leq\\mathrm{e}^{-2\\gamma t}   \\int(f_0-1)^2\\mathrm{d}\\mu \\] where $\\gamma > 0$ is the spectral gap of the linear differential operator \\[   A=\\Delta-\\nabla V\\cdot\\nabla=\\Delta-\\Sigma^{-1}x\\cdot\\nabla \\] seen as an unbounded selfadjoint operator on $L^2(\\mu)$. It is the infinitesimal generator of the Markov semigroup of the process. The term spectral gap comes from the fact that \\[   \\mathrm{spec}(-A)\\subset\\{0\\}\\cup[\\gamma,+\\infty). \\] By using the evolution equation $\\partial_t f_t=Af_t$, the Gr\u00f6nwall lemma, and the integration by parts, the exponential decay above is equivalent to the functional inequality \\[   \\gamma\\mathrm{Var}_\\mu(f)\\leq\\mathbb{E}_\\mu(f(-A)f)   =\\int\\langle\\Sigma\\nabla f,\\nabla f\\rangle\\mathrm{d}\\mu. \\] By the change of function $f=g(\\Sigma^{-1\/2}\\cdot)$ and the optimal Poincar\u00e9 inequality for $\\mathcal{N}(0,I_n)$, \\[   \\gamma=\\lambda_{\\min}(\\Sigma^{-1})=(\\lambda_{\\max}(\\Sigma))^{-1}=(\\|\\Sigma\\|_{\\mathrm{op.}})^{-1}. \\] If $v\\in\\mathbb{R}^d$, $v\\neq0$, is an eigenvector of $\\Sigma^{-1}$ associated to $\\lambda_{\\min}(\\Sigma^{-1})$, then the deformed multivariate Hermite polynomial $f(x)=x\\cdot v$ satisfies $-Af(x)=-0+\\Sigma^{-1}x\\cdot v=\\gamma f(x)$, and is therefore an eigenfunction of $-A$ associated to $\\gamma$.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Disorder and concentration.<\/strong> We make now the matrix $\\Sigma$ random, and independent of the initial condition $X_0$ and the driving Brownian motion $B$. The process $X$ is then a diffusion in random environment, or a disordered OL or OU diffusion process. A simple natural way to make $\\Sigma$ random is to decide that it is the empirical covariance matrix of a sample $Z_1,\\ldots,Z_n$ made with $n$ independent copies of a random vector of $\\mathbb{R}^d$ of law $\\mathcal{N}(0,I_d)$. More precisely, \\[   \\Sigma=\\frac{1}{n}\\sum_{i=1}^nZ_i\\otimes Z_i=\\frac{1}{n}ZZ^\\top \\] where $Z$ is the $d\\times n$ matrix with columns $Z_1,\\ldots,Z_n$. We have \\[   \\mathbb{E}\\Sigma=I_d. \\] The random matrix $\\Sigma$ is symmetric and positive semi-definite. Its law is known as the Wishart distribution, with parameters $n$, $d$, and $I_d$. In the high-dimensional regime \\[   n,d\\to\\infty\\quad\\text{with}\\quad \\frac{d}{n}\\to\\rho\\in(0,\\infty), \\] a famous result of random matrix theory states that \\[   \\lambda_{\\max}(\\Sigma)\\xrightarrow[]{\\mathrm{a.s.}}(1+\\sqrt{\\rho})^2. \\] Moreover, denoting $\\mathrm{TW}$ the Tracy-Widom distribution of parameter $\\beta=1$, \\[   c_\\rho n^{2\/3}(\\lambda_{\\max}(\\Sigma)-(1+\\sqrt{\\rho})^2)   \\xrightarrow[]{\\mathrm{law}}   \\mathrm{TW} \\] where $c_\\rho=(1+\\sqrt{\\rho})^{4\/3}\/\\rho^{1\/6}$. By the delta-method, this gives a concentration of the spectral gap $\\gamma=(\\lambda_{\\max}(\\Sigma))^{-1}$ of the random diffusion operator $A$ in high dimension: \\[   \\gamma\\approx\\frac{1}{(1+\\sqrt{\\rho})^2}-\\frac{\\mathrm{TW}}{c_\\rho(1+\\sqrt{\\rho})^4n^{2\/3}}. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Inverse disorder.<\/strong> Alternatively, we could decide to put the Wishart disorder directly on the quadratic form $V(x)=\\frac{1}{2}\\Sigma^{-1}x\\cdot x$, in other words on $\\Sigma^{-1}$ instead of on $\\Sigma$. In this case, the spectral gap would be directly and simply equal to the $\\lambda_{\\min}$ of the Wishart random matrix, leading, when $\\rho < 1$, to the high-dimensional concentration \\[   \\gamma\\approx(1-\\sqrt{\\rho})^2+\\frac{\\mathrm{TW}}{c_\\rho n^{2\/3}}.   \\] The case $\\rho=1$ corresponds to a hard edge, and gives rise to another type of fluctuation, while the case $\\rho > 1$ gives $\\gamma=0$ with positive probability.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Universality.<\/strong> These high-dimensional behaviors are universal, in the sense that they remain the same if $Z$ is no longer Gaussian but has still i.i.d. coordinates of mean zero and unit variance. However, for the $\\lambda_{\\max}$, we have also to assume that $Z$ has coordinates with finite fourth moment, otherwise the fluctuation is heavy-tailed instead of TW.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Random Schr\u00f6dinger operator.<\/strong> Let us consider the linear isometry \\[   T:L^2(\\mu)\\to L^2(\\mathrm{d}x),\\quad T(f)=f\\sqrt{\\varphi}, \\] where $\\varphi$ is the density of $\\mu$. Then some algebra gives \\[   T\\circ A\\circ T^{-1}   =\\Delta+W \\] where the multiplicative potential is given by \\[   W(x)=-\\tfrac{1}{4}|\\nabla V(x)|^2+\\tfrac{1}{2}\\Delta V(x)   =-\\tfrac{1}{4}|\\Sigma^{-1}x|^2+\\tfrac{1}{2}\\mathrm{Tr}(\\Sigma^{-1}). \\] This is a real Schr\u00f6dinger operator, with potential $W$. Since $W$ is a quadratic form, the operator is a (deformed and real) quantum harmonic oscillator. It has same spectrum as $A$, while its eigenfunctions are overdamped versions of the ones of $A$. This passage from $L^2(\\mu)$ to $L^2(\\mathrm{d}x)$ is known as the ground state transform.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Explicit formulas.<\/strong> For the sake of clarity and completeness, let us compute the full eigendecomposition of $A$. Pick $f:\\mathbb{R}^d\\to\\mathbb{R}$ and $O\\in\\mathbb{O}_n(\\mathbb{R})$. For every $1\\leq i\\leq d$, \\[   \\partial_if(Ox)=\\sum_{j=1}^d(\\partial_jf)(Ox)O_{ji}   \\quad\\text{and}\\quad   \\partial_{ii}f(Ox)=\\sum_{j,k=1}^d(\\partial_{jk}f)(Ox)O_{ji}O_{ki}. \\] But $OO^\\top=I_d$, hence $\\Delta f(O x)=(\\Delta f)(Ox)$, expressing the rotational invariance of $\\Delta$. We also get $\\nabla f(Ox)=O^\\top(\\nabla f)(Ox)$. Thus \\begin{align*}   Af(Ox)   &=(\\Delta f)(Ox)-\\Sigma^{-1}x\\cdot O^\\top(\\nabla f)(Ox)\\\\   &=(\\Delta f)(Ox)-O\\Sigma^{-1}O^\\top Ox\\cdot(\\nabla f)(Ox)\\\\   &=(Bf)(Ox) \\end{align*} where \\[   B=\\Delta-Dx\\cdot\\nabla   \\quad\\text{and}\\quad   D=O\\Sigma^{-1}O^\\top. \\] It follows that $-Bf=\\lambda f$ iff $-Ag=\\lambda g$ where $g(x)=f(Ox)$. Let us select $O$ such that $D=\\mathrm{Diag}(s^2_1,\\ldots,s^2_d)$. Then we have the direct sum \\[   B=\\Delta-Dx\\cdot\\nabla=\\sum_{i=1}^dB_{s_i}   \\quad\\text{where}\\quad   B_{s_i}=\\partial_{ii}^2-s_i^2x_i\\partial_i. \\] Now we observe that for all $f:\\mathbb{R}\\to\\mathbb{R}$, $a > 0$, $s > 0$, \\[   B_s(f(ax))   =a^2f''(ax)-s^2xaf'(ax)   =a^2(B_{\\frac{s}{a}}f)(ax). \\] It follows that $-B_1f=\\lambda f$ iff $-B_sg=\\lambda s^2g$ where $g(x)=f(sx)$.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">But in $L^2(\\mathcal{N}(0,1))$, we have $\\mathrm{spec}(-B_1)=\\mathbb{N}=\\{0,1,2,\\ldots\\}$ and the eigenfunctions are the Hermite polynomials ${(H_k)}_{k\\in\\mathbb{N}}$, orthonormal with respect to the standard Gaussian $\\mathcal{N}(0,1)$. Putting all together, we obtain finally that  \\[   \\mathrm{spec}(-A)=\\{k_1s_1^2+\\cdots+k_ds_d^2:k\\in\\mathbb{N}^d\\}   =s_1^2\\mathbb{N}+\\cdots+s_d^2\\mathbb{N} \\] where $s_1^2,\\ldots,s_d^2$ are the eigenvalues of $\\Sigma^{-1}$, while the subspace of eigenfunctions associated to an eigenvalue $\\lambda\\in\\mathrm{spec}(-A)$ is spanned by the rotated and scaled multivariate Hermite polynomials given, for an arbitrary $k\\in\\mathbb{N}^d$ such that $\\lambda=k_1s_1^2+\\cdots+k_ds_d^2$, by \\[   g(x)=P(Ox)   \\quad\\text{where}\\quad   P(x)=\\prod_{i=1}^dH_{k_i}(s_ix_i) \\] where $O$ is the matrix of eigenvectors of $\\Sigma^{-1}=O^\\top\\mathrm{Diag}(s_1^2,\\ldots,s_d^2)O$.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">We could conduct the previous analysis directly on the Schr\u00f6dinger operator, by using the rotational invariance of the Laplacian and the cyclic property of the trace: \\begin{align*}   (\\Delta+W)(f(Ox))   &=(\\Delta f)(Ox)-\\tfrac{1}{4}|DOx|^2+\\tfrac{1}{2}\\mathrm{Tr}D\\\\   &=\\bigr(\\sum_{i=1}^d(\\partial_{ii}^2-\\tfrac{1}{4}D_{ii}^2+\\tfrac{1}{2}D_{ii})\\bigr)(f(Ox)). \\end{align*}<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\"><strong>Further reading.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align:justify;\">\n<ul>\n<li>Edelman, Alan<br \/>   <strong>The distribution and moments of the smallest eigenvalue of a random matrix of Wishart type<\/strong><br \/>  Linear Algebra and its Applications 159 (1991) 55-80 <\/li>\n<li>Edelman, Alan<br \/>   <strong>Eigenvalues and Condition Numbers of Random Matrices<\/strong><br \/>   SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 9(4) (1988) <\/li>\n<li>Johnstone, Iain M.<br \/>   <strong>On the Distribution of the Largest Eigenvalue in Principal Components  Analysis<\/strong><br \/>   The Annals of Statistics 29(2) (2001) 295-327 <\/li>\n<li>Lee, Ji and Schnelli, Kevin<br \/>   <strong>Tracy-Widom distribution for the largest eigenvalue of real sample covariance matrices with general population<\/strong><br \/>   Annals of Applied Probability 26(6) (2016) 3786-3839. <\/li>\n<li>Auffinger, Antonio, Ben Arous, G\u00e9rard, and P\u00e9ch\u00e9, Sandrine<br \/>   <strong>Poisson convergence for the largest eigenvalues of heavy tailed random matrices<\/strong><br \/>   Annales de l\u2019Institut Henri Poincar\u00e9 - Probabilit\u00e9s et Statistiques 45(3)   (2009) 589-610 <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This short post is devoted to a very natural and simple random diffusion operator on the Euclidean space for which the spectral gap exhibits high-dimensional&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2025\/02\/07\/spectral-gap-concentration-in-high-dimension\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Spectral gap concentration in high dimension<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":268},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21367"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21367"}],"version-history":[{"count":32,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21367\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21585,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21367\/revisions\/21585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}