{"id":11471,"date":"2019-05-21T14:40:19","date_gmt":"2019-05-21T12:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/?p=11471"},"modified":"2024-05-09T20:57:28","modified_gmt":"2024-05-09T18:57:28","slug":"kernels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2019\/05\/21\/kernels\/","title":{"rendered":"Kernels"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_9429\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-9429\" style=\"width: 405px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Coulomb.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9429\" src=\"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Coulomb.jpeg\" alt=\"Charles-Augustin de Coulomb\" width=\"405\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Coulomb.jpeg 405w, https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Coulomb-300x185.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/Coulomb-150x93.jpeg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 405px) 100vw, 405px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-9429\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Charles-Augustin_de_Coulomb\">Charles-Augustin de Coulomb (1736-1806)<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The <b>Coulomb or Newton kernel<\/b> in \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\), \\( {d\\geq1} \\), is often defined for all \\( {x\\neq0} \\) as<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ g(x):=\\begin{cases} -|x| & \\mbox{if }d=1,\\\\ \\log\\frac{1}{|x|} & \\mbox{if }d=2,\\\\ \\frac{1}{|x|^{d-2}} & \\mbox{if }d\\geq3, \\end{cases} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">where \\( {|x|:=\\sqrt{x_1^2+\\cdots+x_d^2}} \\) is the Euclidean norm. It is the fundamental solution of the Laplace or Poisson equation, in the sense that<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ -\\Delta g=c_d\\delta_0 \\quad\\mbox{where}\\quad c_d:= \\begin{cases} 2 & \\mbox{if }d=1,\\\\ 2\\pi & \\mbox{if }d=2,\\\\ (d-2)|\\mathbb{S}^{d-1}| & \\mbox{if }d\\geq 3, \\end{cases} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">where \\( {\\mathbb{S}^{d-1}:=\\{x\\in\\mathbb{R}^d:|x|=1\\}} \\), and, denoting \\( {\\Gamma} \\) the Euler Gamma function,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ |\\mathbb{S}^{d-1}| =2\\frac{\\pi^{d\/2}}{\\Gamma(d\/2)}. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This partial differential equation is in the sense of Schwartz distributions \\( {\\mathcal{D}'(\\mathbb{R}^d)} \\). Note that on \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d\\setminus\\{0\\}} \\), the function \\( {g} \\) is \\( {\\mathcal{C}^\\infty} \\) and <b>harmonic<\/b> in the sense that \\( {\\Delta g(x)=\\partial_1^2g(0)+\\cdots+\\partial_d^2g(0)=0} \\) as a function for all \\( {x\\neq0} \\). The behavior at the origin makes \\( {g} \\) <b>super-harmonic<\/b> (its Laplacian is \\( {\\leq0} \\)), which is a <b>trace analogue of concavity<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The case \\( {d=1} \\) is intuitive: the derivative of \\( {|x|} \\) in the sense of distributions is the Heaviside function \\( {-\\mathbf{1}_{x&lt;0}+\\mathbf{1}_{x&gt;0}} \\) (essentially a jump at zero of height \\( {2} \\)), and the second derivative twice the Dirac mass, \\( {2\\delta_0} \\). The case \\( {d=2} \\) appears also as special: it blows up at infinity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The physical interpretation of \\( {g(x)} \\), up to physical constants, is the <b>potential<\/b> generated at point \\( {x} \\) by a charge at the origin, the <b>field<\/b> being \\( {-\\nabla g(x)} \\). The electric field if we model electrostatics (Coulomb), and the gravitational field if we model gravity (Newton). Note that \\( {-g(x)\\nabla g(x)} \\) vanishes at infinity if \\( {d\\geq2} \\), but not if \\( {d=1} \\), which makes a difference for integration by parts.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For a probability measure \\( {\\mu} \\) on \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\), the potential generated by \\( {\\mu} \\) at point \\( {x} \\) is<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ U_\\mu(x)=(g*\\mu)(x)=\\int g(x-y)\\mu(\\mathrm{d}y). \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In dimension \\( {d=1} \\) or \\( {d=2} \\), this is well defined as soon as \\( {\\mu} \\) integrates \\( {g} \\) at infinity. Note that \\( {g} \\) is Lebesgue locally integrable. The <b>convolution operator<\/b> \\( {\\mu\\mapsto U_\\mu} \\) is the inverse of the Laplacian, and we have the <b>inversion formula<\/b><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ -\\Delta U_\\mu=(-\\Delta g)*\\mu=c_d(\\delta_0*\\mu)=c_d\\mu, \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">in \\( {\\mathcal{D}'(\\mathbb{R}^d)} \\). The potential \\( {U_\\mu} \\) is harmonic outside the support of \\( {\\mu} \\).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Alternative formulation.<\/b> The following alternative definition is simpler:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ g(x):=\\begin{cases} \\frac{1}{(d-2)|x|^{d-2}} & \\mbox{if }d=1\\mbox{ or } d\\geq3,\\\\ \\log\\frac{1}{|x|} & \\mbox{if }d=2, \\end{cases} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">which satisfies<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ -\\Delta g=c_d\\delta_0 \\quad\\mbox{where}\\quad c_d:=|\\mathbb{S}^{d-1}| \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">with the convention \\( {|\\mathbb{S}^0|:=|\\{-1,1\\}|=2} \\). Indeed if \\( {d=1} \\) then \\( {\\frac{1}{(d-2)|x|^{d-2}}=-|x|} \\).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This alternative formulation makes the equilibrium measure nicer in the quadratic confinement case. Namely, the electrostatic energy of a distribution of charges modeled by a probability measure \\( {\\mu} \\) on \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\) with external field generated by a potential \\( {V:\\mathbb{R}^d\\rightarrow\\mathbb{R}} \\) is<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\mathcal{E}_V(\\mu) :=\\iint g(x-y)\\mu(\\mathrm{d}x)\\mu(\\mathrm{d}y)+\\int V(x)\\mathrm{d}\\mu(x). \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This functional is strictly convex and lower semi-continuous with respect to the narrow convergence of probability measures. Its minimizer, \\( {\\mu_*=\\arg\\inf\\mathcal{E}_V} \\), is called the <b>equilibrium measure<\/b>. The Euler-Lagrange equation gives that \\( {\\mu_*} \\) has density<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\frac{\\Delta V}{2c_d} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">on its support. When \\( {V} \\) is strong enough at infinity then this support is compact. For instance when \\( {V(x)=|x|^2} \\) then we find that the equilibrium measure \\( {\\mu_*} \\) is the <b>uniform distribution on the unit ball<\/b> of \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\). Indeed, in this case<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\frac{\\Delta V}{2c_d} =\\frac{2d}{2|\\mathbb{S}^{d-1}|} =\\frac{2d}{2d|\\mathbb{B}^d|} =\\frac{1}{|\\mathbb{B}^d|} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">where \\( {\\mathbb{B}^d=\\{x\\in\\mathbb{R}^d:|x|=1\\}} \\) is the unit ball of \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\). Recall that if \\( {s(r)} \\) and \\( {v(r)} \\) are respectively the surface of the sphere of radius \\( {r} \\) and the volume of the ball of radius \\( {r} \\) in \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\) then \\( {v(r)=r^dv(1)} \\) and \\( {s(r)=v'(r)=dr^{d-1}v(1)} \\) hence \\( {s(1)=dv(1)} \\).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>An even more compact definition.<\/b> If we think the dimension \\( {d} \\) as being a real positive number, we may observe that for all \\( {x\\neq0} \\),<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\lim_{d\\rightarrow2}\\frac{\\frac{1}{|x|^{d-2}}-1}{d-2} =\\partial_{s=0}\\frac{1}{|x|^{s}} =\\partial_{s=0}\\mathrm{e}^{-s\\log|x|} =-\\log|x|. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This means that the formula \\( {\\frac{1}{(d-2)|x|^{d-2}}} \\), already valid for \\( {d=1} \\) and \\( {d\\geq3} \\), is actually also valid for \\( {d=2} \\) provided that we <b>remove a singularity<\/b>. This suggests to define the kernel, for all integers \\( {d\\geq1} \\) and even all real numbers \\( {d\\geq1} \\), and all \\( {x\\neq0} \\), as<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ g(x):=\\frac{1}{(d-2)|x|^{d-2}}-\\frac{1}{d-2}, \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">which satisfies<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ -\\Delta g=2\\frac{\\pi^{d\/2}}{\\Gamma(d\/2)}\\delta_0. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Note that physically, the potential is important only for defining the field, and as a consequence, the potential is defined up to an additive constant. In other words, what matters is the differences of potential values rather than the values themselves.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Riesz kernels.<\/b> The Riesz kernel in dimension \\( {d\\geq2} \\) and parameter \\( {s\\geq0} \\) with \\( {0&lt;s&lt;d} \\) is defined for all \\( {x\\neq0} \\) by the formula<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ g(x):=\\frac{1}{|x|^{d-s}}. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We recover the Coulomb\/Newton kernel when \\( {s=2} \\). The Riesz kernel is the fundamental solution of the <b>fractional Laplacian<\/b>, which is a <b>Fourier multiplier<\/b>, and a <b>non-local operator<\/b> when \\( {d\\neq2} \\). Its inverse is a <b>convolution operator<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Conclusion.<\/b> All in all, if we would like to incorporate all cases in a compact formula, we could consider in \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\), \\( {d\\geq1} \\), for all \\( {s\\in\\mathbb{R}} \\) and \\( {x\\neq0} \\) the kernel<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ g(x):=\\frac{1}{s|x|^s}, \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">with the convention \\( {g(x)=-\\log|x|} \\) if \\( {s=0} \\). The Coulomb\/Newton case corresponds to taking \\( {s=d-2} \\) as we have seen. Indeed, this is more or less the choice often made by my colleague <a href= \"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mathieu_Lewin\">Mathieu Lewin<\/a> for instance, see for example <a href= \"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1905.09138\">arXiv:1905.09138<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Entropy.<\/b> The logarithm appears as a derivative of power functions also in relation with entropy and hypercontractivity, as explained in a <a href= \"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2015\/03\/16\/entropy-ubiquity\/\">previous post<\/a>. The same for the derivation of the logarithmic Sobolev inequality from the Beckner inequalities.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Further reading.<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href= \"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1817225\">Analysis, by Elliott Lieb and Michael Loss<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href= \"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3309890\">Coulomb gases and Ginzburg-Landau vortices, by Sylvia Serfaty<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href= \"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=3308615\">Potential theory, by Lester Helms<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href= \"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=350027\">Foundations of modern potential theory, by Naum Samoilovich Landkof<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href= \"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1485778\">Logarithmic potentials with external fields, by Edward Saff and Vilmos Totik<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Final word.<\/b> Mathematics is also revealing common structures among apparently different things. In Physics, going beyond integers and the apparent physical meaning has advantages, as in the <a href= \"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Replica_trick\">replica trick<\/a>. You may already know this aphorism by <a href= \"https:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Henri_Bouasse\">Henri Bouasse<\/a>, French Physicist from Toulouse of the 19-th century: <em>Le physicien traite les probl\u00e8mes du v\u00e9hicule \u00e0 une roue (la brouette), \u00e0 deux roues (tilbury ou bicyclette), \u00e0 trois, \u00e0 quatre roues. Le math\u00e9maticien traite le probl\u00e8me g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du v\u00e9hicule \u00e0 \\( {n} \\) roues, \\( {n} \\) \u00e9tant entier ou fractionnaire, positif ou n\u00e9gatif, r\u00e9el ou imaginaire.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Coulomb or Newton kernel in \\( {\\mathbb{R}^d} \\), \\( {d\\geq1} \\), is often defined for all \\( {x\\neq0} \\) as \\[ g(x):=\\begin{cases} -|x| &amp;&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2019\/05\/21\/kernels\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Kernels<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":228},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11471"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11471"}],"version-history":[{"count":35,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20300,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11471\/revisions\/20300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}