{"id":10047,"date":"2018-01-01T13:10:44","date_gmt":"2018-01-01T12:10:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/?p=10047"},"modified":"2018-07-10T15:08:21","modified_gmt":"2018-07-10T13:08:21","slug":"around-the-circular-law-erratum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2018\/01\/01\/around-the-circular-law-erratum\/","title":{"rendered":"Around the circular law : erratum"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_10048\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10048\" style=\"width: 220px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/O%27Rourke\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-10048\" src=\"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/ORourke_Arms.svg_.png\" alt=\"O'Rourke Arms\" width=\"220\" height=\"242\" srcset=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/ORourke_Arms.svg_.png 220w, https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/ORourke_Arms.svg_-136x150.png 136w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 220px) 100vw, 220px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10048\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">O'Rourke Arms<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"\/scripts\/search?q=Sean+ORourke+mathematics\">Sean O'Rourke<\/a> pointed out on December 30, 2017 that a notation should be corrected in the statement of Lemma A.1 in the probability survey <a href=\"https:\/\/mathscinet.ams.org\/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2908617\">Around the circular law<\/a> (2012) that I wrote years ago in collaboration with <a href=\"\/script\/search.php?q=Charles+Bordenave+Mathematics\">Charles Bordenave<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Indeed the definition of \\( {\\sigma^2} \\) should be corrected to<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\sigma^2 :=\\min_{1\\leq i,j\\leq n}\\mathrm{Var}(X_{ij}\\mid|X_{i,j}|\\leq a)&gt;0. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It was erroneously written<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\sigma^2 :=\\min_{1\\leq i,j\\leq n}\\mathrm{Var}(X_{ij}\\mathbf{1}_{|X_{i,j}|\\leq a})&gt;0. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Let us take this occasion for a back to basics about <b>conditional variance<\/b> and <b>variance of truncation<\/b>. Let \\( {X} \\) be a real random variable on \\( {(\\Omega,\\mathcal{F},\\mathbb{P})} \\) and \\( {A\\in\\mathcal{F}} \\) be an event. First the real number \\( {\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A)=\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid\\mathbf{1}_A=1)} \\) is not the random variable \\( {\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid\\mathbf{1}_A)} \\). We have<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\mathbb{E}(X\\mid\\mathbf{1}_A) =\\underbrace{\\frac{\\mathbb{E}(X\\mathbf{1}_A)}{\\mathbb{P}(A)}}_{\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A)}\\mathbf{1}_A +\\underbrace{\\frac{\\mathbb{E}(X\\mathbf{1}_{A^c})}{\\mathbb{P}(A^c)}}_{\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A^c)}\\mathbf{1}_{A^c}. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Note that this formula still makes sense when \\( {\\mathbb{P}(A)=0} \\) or \\( {\\mathbb{P}(A)=1} \\).<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The quantity \\( {\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A)} \\) makes sense only if \\( {\\mathbb{P}(A)&gt;0} \\), and in this case, the conditional variance of \\( {X} \\) given the event \\( {A} \\) is the real number given by<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\begin{array}{rcl} \\mathrm{Var}(X\\mid A) &amp;=&amp;\\mathbb{E}((X-\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A))^2\\mid A)\\\\ &amp;=&amp;\\mathbb{E}(X^2\\mid A)-\\mathbb{E}(X\\mid A)^2\\\\ &amp;=&amp;\\frac{\\mathbb{E}(X^2\\mathbf{1}_A)}{\\mathbb{P}(A)} -\\frac{\\mathbb{E}(X\\mathbf{1}_A)^2}{\\mathbb{P}(A)^2}\\\\ &amp;=&amp; \\frac{\\mathbb{E}(X^2\\mathbf{1}_A)\\mathbb{P}(A)-\\mathbb{E}(X\\mathbf{1}_A)^2}{\\mathbb{P}(A)^2}\\\\ &amp;=&amp;\\mathbb{E}_A(X^2)-\\mathbb{E}_A(X)^2=:\\mathrm{Var}_A(X) \\end{array} \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">where \\( {\\mathbb{E}_A} \\) is the expectation with respect to the probability measure with density \\( {\\mathbf{1}_A\/\\mathbb{P}(A)} \\) with respect to \\( {\\mathbb{P}} \\). In particular, by the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\mathrm{Var}(X\\mid A) \\geq 0 \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">with equality if and only if \\( {X} \\) and \\( {\\mathbf{1}_A} \\) are colinear.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Of course \\( {\\mathrm{Var}(X\\mid A)=0} \\) if \\( {X} \\) is constant. However \\( {\\mathrm{Var}(X\\mid A)} \\) may vanish for a non-constant \\( {X} \\). Indeed if \\( {A=\\{|X|\\leq a\\}} \\) and if \\( {X\\sim\\frac{1}{2}\\delta_{a\/2}+\\frac{1}{2}\\delta_{2a}} \\) then \\( {X\\mid A} \\) is constant and equal to \\( {a\/2} \\). In this example, since \\( {X\\mathbf{1}_A} \\) is not a constant, this shows also that one cannot lower bound \\( {\\mathrm{Var}(X\\mid A)} \\) with the variance of the truncation<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\mathrm{Var}(X\\mathbf{1}_A)=\\mathbb{E}(X^2\\mathbf{1}_A)-\\mathbb{E}(X\\mathbf{1}_A)^2. \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><b>Another notable correction.<\/b> <a href=\"\/scripts\/search.php?q=Myl%C3%A8ne+Ma%C3%AFda\">Myl\u00e8ne Ma\u00efda<\/a> pointed out to me on February 27 2018 that at the bottom of page 14, just before the statement<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\\[ \\sup_{z\\in C}|n\\varphi_{n,1}(\\sqrt{n}z)-\\pi^{-1}\\mathbf{1}_{[0,1]}(|z|)|=0 \\]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">the compact set \\( {C} \\) must be taken in \\( {\\{z\\in\\mathbb{C}:|z|\\neq1\\}} \\) and not on the whole complex plane \\( {\\mathbb{C}} \\). Indeed, when \\( {|z|=1} \\), \\( {n\\varphi_{n,1}(\\sqrt{n}z)} \\) tends as \\( {n\\rightarrow\\infty} \\) to \\( {1\/2} \\), and not to \\( {\\pi^{-1}} \\), see for instance <a href=\"http:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2017\/06\/30\/about-the-exponential-series\/\"> this former post<\/a> for a one formula proof based on the central limit theorem for Poisson random variables. Anyway this is really not surprising since a sequence of continuous functions cannot converge uniformly to a discontinuous function.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Yet another correction.<\/strong> Page 39 line 9 replace $M_\\mu(a)$ by $M_\\mu(q)$.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sean O'Rourke pointed out on December 30, 2017 that a notation should be corrected in the statement of Lemma A.1 in the probability survey Around&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/2018\/01\/01\/around-the-circular-law-erratum\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Around the circular law : erratum<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"iawp_total_views":106},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10047"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10047"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10488,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10047\/revisions\/10488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/djalil.chafai.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}